test
Rear Box & Upfit
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| Commercially built in-house (23, 26 ft) result: Shorter lead times & consistent quality | Purchased RV/bus shell result: Longer lead times & inconsistent quality |
Floor Foundation
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| 12–16" spacing result: No floor sagging from equipment weight/storage | 24–36" spacing result: Sagging floor due to equipment weight/storage |
2.5” Walls/Roof
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| 2” Thick alum frame 16” OC result: Lightweight/stronger for equipment/storage | 1–1.5" Steel Tube 24-48” OC result: Heavier & less structure for equipment/storage |
Insulation
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| 2" Closed foam spacing result: Better R-Value for cooling/heating/sound | 1–1.5" batting/spray foam result: Less R-value, less efficient heating/cooling/sound |
Exterior
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| Smooth seamless FRP exterior result: Great for branding | Textured/bumpy result: Poor graphics application and limited branding |
Interior
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| Smooth seamless FRP interior result: Easy cleaning, sterilization and white board use | Panels and non porous result: Hard to clean and cannot be sterilized easily |
Electrical
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| Routed in conduit result: Easily diagnosed & serviceable | Buried in walls result: Hard to diagnose/service issues |
Side Entry Door
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| 30” W Swing & Insulated result: Ideal size for client entry | 24”, 36”, or Glass bus doors result: Bad size, Not insulated and loud |
Floor Height
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| 3 steps from ground result: Safer entry for staff and patients | 4–5 steps result: More difficult entry for staff and patients |
Floor Material
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| One-piece composite result: Strong, durable, and weather resistant | Multi-piece plywood result: Separation and moisture damage risk |
Warranty/Service
| Magnum Mobile | Competitors |
|---|---|
| 5 years & locally serviced result: Flexible to work with local service centers | 1–3 years ??? result: Shorter coverage, limited-service centers |
| Feature | Magnum Mobile | Advantage | Competitors | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Box & Upfit | 🟩 Commercially built in-house (23, 26 ft) | 🟩 Shorter lead times & consistent quality | ⬜ Purchased RV/bus shell | ⬜ Longer lead times & inconsistent quality |
| Floor Foundation | 🟩 12–16" spacing | 🟩 No floor sagging from equipment weight/storage | ⬜ 24–36" spacing | ⬜ Sagging floor due to equipment weight/storage |
| 2.5” Walls/Roof | 🟩 2” Thick alum frame 16” OC | 🟩 Lightweight/stronger for equipment/storage | ⬜ 1–1.5" Steel Tube 24-48” OC | ⬜ Heavier & less structure for equipment/storage |
| Insulation | 🟩 2" Closed foam spacing | 🟩 Better R-Value for cooling/heating/sound | ⬜ 1–1.5" batting/spray foam | ⬜ Less R-value, less efficient heating/cooling/sound |
| Exterior | 🟩 Smooth seamless FRP exterior | 🟩 Great for branding | ⬜ Textured/bumpy | ⬜ Poor graphics application and limited branding |
| Interior | 🟩 Smooth seamless FRP interior | 🟩 Easy cleaning, sterilization and white board use | ⬜ Panels and non porous | ⬜ Hard to clean and cannot be sterilized easily |
| Electrical | 🟩 Routed in conduit | 🟩 Easily diagnosed & serviceable | ⬜ Buried in walls | ⬜ Hard to diagnose/service issues |
| Side Entry Door | 🟩 30” W Swing & Insulated | 🟩 Ideal size for client entry | ⬜ 24”, 36”, or Glass bus doors | ⬜ Bad size, Not insulated and loud |
| Floor Height | 🟩 3 steps from ground | 🟩 Safer entry for staff and patients | ⬜ 4–5 steps | ⬜ More difficult entry for staff and patients |
| Floor Material | 🟩 One-piece composite | 🟩 Strong, durable, and weather resistant | ⬜ Multi-piece plywood | ⬜ Separation and moisture damage risk |
| Warranty/Service | 🟩 5 years & locally serviced | 🟩 Flexible to work with local service centers | ⬜ 1–3 years ??? | ⬜ Shorter coverage, limited-service centers |